Feudalism

Feudalism, alternatively termed the feudal system, encompassed a diverse array of customs and societal structures prevalent in medieval Europe between the 9th and 15th centuries. Fundamentally, it organized society through relationships predicated on land tenure in exchange for service or labor.

Feudalism, also known as the feudal system, was a combination of various customs and systems that flourished in medieval Europe from the 9th to 15th centuries. Broadly defined, it was a way of structuring society around relationships derived from the holding of land in exchange for service or labour.

François Louis Ganshof's classic 1944 definition characterizes feudalism as a framework of reciprocal legal and military duties among the warrior nobility, centered on the core elements of lords, vassals, and fiefs. In contrast, Marc Bloch's broader 1939 interpretation extends beyond the warrior nobility to encompass the obligations of all three societal estates—the nobility, the clergy, and the peasantry—all interconnected by manorialism. This comprehensive view is occasionally termed a "feudal society."

While the term feudalism originates from the medieval Latin words feodum or feudum (meaning fief), individuals living during the Middle Ages did not conceptualize it as a distinct formal political system. Following the influential works of Elizabeth A. R. Brown's "The Tyranny of a Construct" (1974) and Susan Reynolds's Fiefs and Vassals (1994), medieval historians have engaged in continuous, yet inconclusive, debate regarding the utility of feudalism as an analytical framework for comprehending medieval society.

Beyond Europe, certain scholars have extended the application of this label to various non-European contexts, such as feudal Japan, medieval Ethiopia, China during the Spring and Autumn period, ancient Egypt, the Parthian Empire, India prior to the Mughal dynasty, and the Antebellum South, including the era of Jim Crow laws in the American South.

Definition

The adjective feudal appeared in usage by at least 1405, and the noun feudalism became established by the close of the 18th century, mirroring the French term féodalité.

Ganshof's classic definition posits feudalism as a system characterized by reciprocal legal and military duties among the warrior nobility, structured around the fundamental concepts of lords, vassals, and fiefs. However, Ganshof himself acknowledged that his analysis pertained exclusively to the "narrow, technical, legal sense of the word."

Marc Bloch's 1939 work, Feudal Society, presents a more expansive definition that incorporates not only the duties of the warrior nobility but also those of all three societal estates: the nobility, the clergy, and the laboring population, primarily the peasantry, all of whom were integrated into a system of manorialism. This societal arrangement is frequently designated as a feudal society, reflecting Bloch's terminology.

Beyond its European origins, the concept of feudalism has been applied to analogous social structures in other geographical areas. This application is most common in analyses of feudal Japan under the shoguns and occasionally in discussions of medieval Ethiopia, which exhibited certain feudal attributes, sometimes labeled "semifeudal." Furthermore, some scholars have extended the feudalism analogy to identify similar characteristics or remnants in diverse regions such as Spring and Autumn period China, ancient Egypt, the Parthian Empire, and India preceding the Mughal dynasty.

The designation feudalism has also been employed, frequently with pejorative connotations, to describe non-Western societies perceived to possess institutions and societal attitudes akin to those of medieval Europe. Consequently, some historians and political theorists contend that the extensive and varied usage of the term feudalism has diluted its specific meaning, prompting them to dismiss its utility as a conceptual tool for societal analysis.

The relevance of the term feudalism has also been debated concerning certain Central and Eastern European nations, including Poland and Lithuania. Scholars note that the medieval political and economic frameworks in these countries shared some, though not all, characteristics with the Western European societies typically categorized as feudal.

Etymology

The term feudal originates from the medieval Latin feudālis, which is the adjectival form of feudum, meaning 'fee' or 'feud'. This form was first documented in a charter issued by Charles the Fat in 884. It shares linguistic connections with Old French terms like fé and fié, Provençal variants such as feo, feu, fieu, and the Italian word fio. The precise etymological root of feudālis remains undetermined. While a Germanic origin, possibly from fehu or fehôd, has been suggested, these specific terms are not attested with the relevant meaning in Germanic historical records or within the Latin texts of Frankish legal codes.

In 1870, Johan Hendrik Caspar Kern advanced a theory regarding the etymology of fehu, a proposition subsequently endorsed by scholars including William Stubbs and Marc Bloch. Kern posited that the word originated from a hypothetical Frankish compound, *fehu-ôd, where *fehu signified 'cattle' and -ôd denoted 'goods', collectively implying a "movable object of value." Marc Bloch further elucidated this by noting that by the early 10th century, while land was commonly assessed monetarily, transactions often involved payment with items of comparable worth, such as weaponry, apparel, livestock, or provisions. This practice was referred to as feos, a term that evolved to signify payment in kind rather than currency. This concept was later extended to land, where land itself served as recompense for loyalty, particularly to a vassal. Consequently, the archaic term feos, initially denoting "movable property," underwent a semantic shift to feus, which came to represent its antithesis: "landed property."

Archibald Ross Lewis suggests an alternative etymology for fief, proposing its derivation not from feudum (or feodum) but from foderum. The earliest documented instance of this term appears in Astronomus's Vita Hludovici (840). Within this text, a specific passage concerning Louis the Pious states: annona militaris quas vulgo foderum vocant. This Latin phrase translates to: "Louis forbade that military provender (which they popularly call 'fodder') be furnished."

In early medieval Latin European records, a land allocation granted in return for service was designated as a beneficium. Subsequently, the terms feudum or feodum progressively superseded beneficium in these documents. The initial confirmed usage of this replacement dates to 984, although rudimentary forms were observed up to a century prior. The precise etymology of feudum and the rationale for its displacement of beneficium remain subjects of scholarly debate, with several theories presented in subsequent discussions.

The adjective "féodal" first appeared in French legal treatises during the 17th century, specifically in 1614. It was subsequently translated into English legal scholarship, where it was employed in phrases such as "feodal government."

During the 18th century, Adam Smith, in his seminal work The Wealth of Nations (1776), significantly contributed to the lexicon by popularizing the terms "feudal government" and "feudal system" in his analysis of economic structures. However, the phrase "feudal system" had previously appeared in 1736 within Baronia Anglica, a work published posthumously, nine years after its author Thomas Madox's death in 1727. Furthermore, in 1771, John Whitaker introduced the term "feudalism" and conceptualized the "feudal pyramid" in his publication, The History of Manchester.

Alauddin Samarrai proposes an alternative theory positing an Arabic etymology for the term, deriving it from fuyū. This word is the plural of fay, which literally translates to 'the returned' and specifically referred to 'land acquired from enemies who offered no resistance'. Samarrai's hypothesis suggests that the diverse early forms of 'fief', such as feo, feu, feuz, and feuum, indicate a loanword origin. The initial appearance of these terms is documented in Languedoc, a region of Europe with minimal Germanic influence and adjacent to Al-Andalus (Muslim Spain). Moreover, the earliest recorded use of feuum as a substitute for beneficium is dated to 899, coinciding with the establishment of a Muslim stronghold at Fraxinetum (La Garde-Freinet) in Provence. Samarrai postulates that French scribes, composing in Latin, might have attempted to transliterate the Arabic term fuyū (the plural of fay), which was employed by contemporary Muslim invaders and occupiers. This transliteration process could have generated the variety of forms—feo, feu, feuz, feuum, among others—from which feudum eventually evolved. Nevertheless, Samarrai cautions that this theory should be approached with circumspection, as medieval and early modern Muslim scribes frequently invoked etymologically "fanciful roots" to substantiate unsubstantiated assertions of Arabian or Muslim provenance.

History

Feudalism, in its various forms, typically arose from the fragmentation of imperial authority, exemplified by the Carolingian Empire during the 9th century CE, which lacked the requisite bureaucratic infrastructure^{[clarification needed]} to sustain cavalry forces without granting them land. These mounted soldiers subsequently established hereditary control over their assigned territories, with their authority extending across social, political, judicial, and economic domains.

Such accrued powers substantially eroded the centralized authority within these empires. Nevertheless, with the subsequent re-establishment of infrastructure capable of sustaining centralized power, as observed in European monarchies, feudalism gradually receded in favor of these emergent power structures and ultimately ceased to exist.

The Classical Model of Feudalism

François Louis Ganshof's seminal interpretation of feudalism delineates a system of reciprocal legal and military duties among the warrior aristocracy, predicated upon the fundamental concepts of lords, vassals, and fiefs. Generally, a lord constituted a noble landowner, a vassal was an individual granted land possession by the lord, and the land itself was designated a fief. In return for the usufruct of the fief and the lord's protection, the vassal rendered various forms of service. Feudal land tenure encompassed numerous variations, involving both military and non-military obligations. The reciprocal obligations and rights pertaining to the fief, shared between lord and vassal, constituted the bedrock of the feudal relationship.

The Institution of Vassalage

Prior to a lord's conferral of land (a fief) upon an individual, that person first had to be formally established as a vassal. This formalization occurred during a commendation ceremony, which encompassed an act of homage and an oath of fealty. During the homage ritual, a contractual agreement was forged between the lord and vassal, wherein the vassal pledged military service at the lord's behest, while the lord committed to safeguarding the vassal from external threats. The term Fealty derives from the Latin fidelitas, signifying the unwavering loyalty a vassal owed to their feudal lord. Furthermore, "fealty" designates a specific oath that explicitly reiterates the vassal's commitments established during homage, typically administered subsequent to the act of homage itself.

Upon the conclusion of the commendation ceremony, the lord and vassal formally entered a feudal relationship characterized by mutually agreed-upon obligations. The primary duty of the vassal to the lord involved rendering aid, particularly military service. Equipped through the revenues generated by the fief, the vassal was compelled to respond to the lord's summons for military deployment. The assurance of military assistance constituted the paramount motivation for the lord to establish such a feudal bond. Furthermore, vassals might incur additional obligations to their lord, including attendance at his court, which could be manorial, baronial (both referred to as court baron), or the royal court.

Vassals were also expected to provide "counsel," necessitating their assembly in a council when the lord confronted significant decisions. Within the manorial context, such deliberations might pertain to routine agricultural policies, yet they also encompassed the lord's adjudication of criminal offenses, occasionally extending to capital punishment. At the royal feudal court, these discussions could address critical matters such as declarations of war. These instances illustrate the diverse applications of feudalism; however, it is crucial to note that feudal customs and practices exhibited considerable variation across different periods and geographical regions within Europe.

The Feudal Transformation in France

Initially, the feudal allocation of land was conceptualized as a personal covenant between a lord and a vassal. However, as fiefs evolved into hereditary possessions over time, the system's character transformed into what historian Marc Bloch termed a "politics of land." The 11th century in France witnessed a phenomenon historians have labeled a "feudal revolution," a "mutation," or a "fragmentation of powers," as described by Bloch. This development diverged significantly from the trajectory of feudalism in England, Italy, or Germany during the same or subsequent periods. During this era, counties and duchies began to fragment into smaller territories as castellans and minor seigneurs asserted control over local domains. Concurrently, lesser lords, mirroring the actions of earlier comital families, appropriated a broad spectrum of state prerogatives and rights. These included, but were not limited to, travel tolls, market levies, fees for woodland access, various obligations, the compulsory use of the lord's mill, and critically, the highly lucrative rights of justice. Georges Duby collectively referred to these as the "seigneurie banale." Consequently, power during this period became increasingly individualized.

Nevertheless, this "fragmentation of powers" did not uniformly affect all regions of France. In several counties, such as Flanders, Normandy, Anjou, and Toulouse, counts successfully retained authority over their territories well into the 12th century and beyond. Consequently, in areas like Normandy and Flanders, the vassal-feudal structure served as an efficient mechanism for ducal and comital governance, effectively binding vassals to their respective lords. Conversely, in other regions, this system engendered considerable disorder, exacerbated by the common practice of vassals pledging allegiance to multiple lords. To address this complexity, the concept of a "liege lord" emerged in the 12th century, designating a lord to whom a vassal's obligations were considered paramount.

The Demise of European Feudalism (c. 1500–1850s)

During this period, affluent commoners, often described as "middle-class," increasingly resented the authority and prerogatives exercised by feudal lords, overlords, and the nobility. They favored a system of autocratic governance, wherein a monarch and a singular royal court wielded nearly absolute power. Feudal nobles, irrespective of their ethnic backgrounds, typically perceived themselves as custodians of a politically autonomous system, a perspective that frequently left them perplexed by the challenges to their authority before the eventual dismantling of most feudal statutes.

By approximately 1500, the majority of feudalism's military components had effectively ceased. This decline was partly attributable to a shift in military organization from armies composed of the nobility to professional fighting forces, thereby diminishing the nobility's power claims. Additionally, the Black Death significantly weakened the nobility's control over the lower social strata. Nevertheless, remnants of the feudal system persisted in France until the French Revolution of the 1790s. Even after the dissolution of original feudal relationships, numerous institutional vestiges of feudalism remained. Historian Georges Lefebvre details how, during an early phase of the French Revolution, specifically on the night of August 4, 1789, France formally abolished the enduring remnants of the feudal order. The declaration proclaimed, "The National Assembly abolishes the feudal system entirely." Lefebvre further elucidates:

The Assembly, without prior deliberation, enthusiastically endorsed principles such as tax equality and the commutation of all manorial rights, with the exception of those pertaining to personal servitude, which were to be eradicated without compensation. Subsequently, a series of other propositions met with similar approval, including the standardization of legal penalties, universal access to public office, the elimination of venality in office, the transformation of the tithe into redeemable payments, religious freedom, and the prohibition against holding multiple benefices. Ultimately, the special privileges afforded to provinces and towns were relinquished as a final concession.

Initially, peasants were expected to compensate for the abolition of seigneurial dues, which impacted over a quarter of France's agricultural land and constituted a significant portion of the revenue for large landowners. However, the majority of peasants declined to make these payments, leading to the cancellation of this obligation in 1793. Consequently, the peasantry acquired their land without cost and were simultaneously relieved of paying the tithe to the church.

In the Kingdom of France, the Constituent Assembly abolished feudalism through a decree issued on August 11, 1789, following the French Revolution; this provision was subsequently extended to various regions of the Italian kingdom after the French military invasion. Within the Kingdom of Naples, Joachim Murat formally ended feudalism with a law enacted on August 2, 1806, which was then implemented by a subsequent law on September 1, 1806, and a royal decree on December 3, 1808. The Sicilian Parliament issued the abolition law for the Kingdom of Sicily on August 10, 1812. In Piedmont, feudalism ceased due to edicts promulgated by Charles Emmanuel IV on March 7 and July 19, 1797, although in the Kingdom of Sardinia, specifically on the island itself, feudalism was not abolished until an edict on August 5, 1848.

The Kingdom of Lombardy–Venetia saw the abolition of all feudal bonds with the enactment of Law No. 342 on December 5, 1861. This system persisted in certain areas of Central and Eastern Europe until the 1850s. Slavery was abolished in Romania in 1856, and Russia finally ended serfdom in 1861.

More recently, in Scotland, the Abolition of Feudal Tenure etc. (Scotland) Act 2000 came into full effect on November 28, 2004, thereby terminating the remnants of the Scottish feudal system. The final feudal regime, located on the island of Sark, was abolished in December 2008, coinciding with the inaugural democratic elections for a local parliament and the establishment of a government. This transformation resulted from the European Parliament's legal intervention, which deemed Sark's constitutional system contrary to human rights, leading to the imposition of parliamentary democracy after a series of legal challenges.

Feudal Society

Marc Bloch's definition of "feudal society" is more expansive than Ganshof's, encompassing not only the warrior aristocracy bound by vassalage but also the peasantry subject to manorialism and the Church's estates within the feudal structure. Consequently, the feudal order permeated society comprehensively, although the "powerful and well-differentiated social group of the urban classes" eventually established a distinct position somewhat external to the traditional feudal hierarchy.

Historiography

During the medieval period, the concept of feudalism was unrecognized, and the system it describes was not perceived as a formal political structure by contemporaries. This section delineates the historical development of the idea of feudalism, tracing its origins among scholars and thinkers, its evolution over time, and contemporary debates regarding its application.

Evolution of the Concept

The notion of a feudal state or period, understood as a regime or era dominated by lords wielding financial or social power and prestige, gained widespread acceptance in the mid-18th century. This development was influenced by works such as Montesquieu's De L'Esprit des Lois (1748; published in English as The Spirit of Law) and Henri de Boulainvilliers's Histoire des anciens Parlements de France (1737; published in English as An Historical Account of the Ancient Parliaments of France or States-General of the Kingdom, 1739). During the 18th century, Enlightenment writers employed the term "feudalism" to disparage the antiquated system of the Ancien Régime, or the French monarchy. This era, characterized by the Enlightenment's emphasis on reason, viewed the Middle Ages as the "Dark Ages." Enlightenment authors frequently derided and ridiculed aspects of the "Dark Ages," including feudalism, projecting its negative attributes onto the contemporary French monarchy for political advantage. For these thinkers, "feudalism" primarily signified seigneurial privileges and prerogatives, which is precisely what the French Constituent Assembly intended to abolish when it dismantled the "feudal regime" in August 1789.

Adam Smith utilized the term "feudal system" to characterize a social and economic framework defined by inherited social ranks, each possessing inherent social and economic privileges and obligations. In such a system, wealth was primarily derived from agriculture, which was organized not by market forces but by customary labor services owed by serfs to landowning nobles.

Heinrich Brunner

In his 1887 work, The Equestrian Service and the Beginnings of the Feudal System, Heinrich Brunner posited that Charles Martel established the groundwork for feudalism in the 8th century. Brunner characterized Martel as an exceptional military leader who secularized ecclesiastical properties to furnish his adherents with precarias, or leases, in exchange for their military contributions. Martel's escalating military expenditures, driven by the transition to a cavalry-based force, necessitated the acquisition of church lands to sustain his followers.

In contrast to Brunner's argument, Paul Fouracre proposes that the Church itself exercised authority over land through its own system of precarias. The prevalent form of precarias involved the donation of land to the Church for diverse spiritual and legal objectives. While Charles Martel undeniably employed precaria for his own ends, even displacing certain bishops and installing his own lay appointees, Fouracre minimizes Martel's influence on fundamental political transformation. He suggests these actions were primarily military strategies aimed at regional control through land accumulation via tenancies and the removal of dissenting bishops, rather than a deliberate creation of feudalism.

Karl Marx

During the 19th century, Karl Marx incorporated the term into his analysis of societal economic and political evolution, characterizing feudalism (or more frequently, feudal society or the feudal mode of production) as the precursor to capitalism. Marx defined feudalism by the aristocracy's control over arable land, which fostered a class-based society founded on the exploitation of peasants. This exploitation typically manifested through serfdom, primarily involving labor, produce, and monetary rents. He famously described feudalism as a 'democracy of unfreedom,' highlighting the subjugation of feudal subjects alongside a comprehensive integration of political and economic spheres, a characteristic he found absent in industrial capitalism.

Marx further employed feudalism as a conceptual framework for comprehending the power dynamics between capitalists and wage-laborers in his contemporary era, stating: "in pre-capitalist systems it was obvious that most people did not control their own destiny—under feudalism, for instance, serfs had to work for their lords. Capitalism seems different because people are in theory free to work for themselves or for others as they choose. Yet most workers have as little control over their lives as feudal serfs." Subsequently, certain Marxist scholars, such as Eric Wolf, extended this classification to encompass non-European societies, categorizing feudalism alongside imperial China and the pre-Columbian Inca Empire as 'tributary' societies.

Later Studies

During the late 19th and early 20th centuries, medieval British historians J. Horace Round and Frederic William Maitland presented divergent interpretations regarding the nature of Anglo-Saxon English society prior to the Norman Conquest in 1066. Round asserted that feudalism was an import introduced by the Normans to England, whereas Maitland maintained that its foundational principles were already established in Britain before 1066. This scholarly debate persists; however, a prevailing consensus suggests that pre-Conquest England featured commendation, which encompassed certain personal aspects of feudalism. Subsequently, William the Conqueror implemented a modified and more stringent form of northern French feudalism in England, notably incorporating (in 1086) requirements for all landholders by feudal tenure, including the vassals of his primary vassals, to swear oaths of loyalty directly to the king. Feudal tenure obligated vassals to supply a specified quota of knights or an equivalent monetary payment.

During the 20th century, two prominent historians presented significantly divergent interpretations of feudalism. Marc Bloch, a French historian widely regarded as the most influential medievalist of his era, adopted a sociological lens rather than a purely legal or military one to analyze feudalism. In his seminal work, Feudal Society (published in 1939 and translated into English in 1961), Bloch posited a feudal system that extended beyond the aristocracy. His distinctive contribution was the assertion that peasants were integral to the feudal dynamic: just as vassals rendered military service for a fief, peasants provided manual labor in exchange for protection, thereby establishing a reciprocal feudal bond. Bloch contended that various societal components could be understood through a feudal framework, with all facets of existence revolving around "lordship." Consequently, he argued for the utility of conceptualizing a feudal ecclesiastical structure, feudal courtly (and anti-courtly) literature, and a feudal economic system.

Conversely, the Belgian historian François Louis Ganshof offered a more circumscribed definition of feudalism, emphasizing its legal and military dimensions. He maintained that feudal relationships were exclusively confined to the medieval nobility. Ganshof elaborated on this perspective in his 1944 work, Qu'est-ce que la féodalité? (translated as Feudalism). While his canonical definition of feudalism remains broadly accepted by medieval scholars, it faces scrutiny from those advocating a broader conceptualization and from those who perceive insufficient consistency in noble interactions to substantiate such a framework.

Georges Duby, though not formally enrolled in the Annales school—the scholarly circle associated with Marc Bloch and Lucien Febvre—nonetheless became a prominent proponent of the Annaliste tradition. His 1952 doctoral thesis, subsequently published as La société aux XIe et XIIe siècles dans la région mâconnaise (Society in the 11th and 12th centuries in the Mâconnais region), drew upon extensive archival materials from the Burgundian monastery of Cluny and the dioceses of Mâcon and Dijon. Through this research, Duby meticulously analyzed the intricate social and economic interactions among individuals and institutions within the Mâconnais region. He identified a significant transformation in medieval societal structures around the year 1000. Duby contended that during the early 11th century, governing bodies, specifically the comital courts established under the Carolingian monarchy that had upheld public justice and order in Burgundy throughout the 9th and 10th centuries, gradually diminished. These institutions were supplanted by a nascent feudal system where autonomous aristocratic knights exerted authority over peasant communities through coercive methods and intimidation.

In 1939, Austrian historian Theodor Mayer proposed the concept of a Personenverbandsstaat (personal interdependency state), positioning the feudal state as a subordinate entity in contrast to the territorial state. This particular form of state organization, often associated with the Holy Roman Empire, was characterized as the most comprehensive manifestation of medieval governance. It augmented the traditional feudal framework of lordship and vassalage with a system of personal association among the nobility. However, the universal applicability of this concept beyond the Holy Roman Empire has been challenged, notably by Susan Reynolds. Furthermore, the Personenverbandsstaat concept has been critically re-evaluated and largely superseded within German historiography due to its perceived bias and reductionist tendencies, particularly concerning its potential to legitimize the Führerprinzip.

Critiques of the Feudal Paradigm

In 1974, American historian Elizabeth A. R. Brown critiqued the term feudalism, deeming it an anachronism that erroneously implies conceptual uniformity. Observing the proliferation of numerous, often conflicting, definitions for feudalism, she contended that the word constitutes a mere construct, lacking foundation in medieval actuality. Brown characterized it as a modern historical invention retroactively imposed upon the historical record. Proponents of Brown's perspective have advocated for the complete removal of the term from medieval history textbooks and academic discourse. Susan Reynolds further developed Brown's initial hypothesis in her 1994 publication, Fiefs and Vassals: The Medieval Evidence Reinterpreted. While some contemporaries disputed Reynolds's methodological approach, other historians have endorsed her arguments. Reynolds posits:

Many comparative models of feudalism, including those employed by Marxists, continue to be rooted in 16th-century interpretations or include elements considered superficial or extraneous from a Marxist perspective. Even within the confined scope of European feudalism, narrowly defined, it remains highly questionable whether feudo-vassalic structures constituted a distinct and cohesive set of institutions or concepts, separate from other contemporary societal frameworks.

The descriptor feudal has also been extended to non-Western societies, where institutional and attitudinal parallels with medieval Europe are believed to have existed. Japan, in particular, has been a subject of extensive research concerning this application. Karl Friday observes that 21st-century historians of Japan seldom employ the term 'feudalism,' with comparative specialists now prioritizing fundamental distinctions over perceived similarities. Consequently, critics argue that the diverse applications of the term feudalism have rendered it devoid of precise meaning, prompting some historians and political theorists to dismiss its utility as a conceptual framework for societal analysis.

Richard Abels, a historian, observes that contemporary textbooks on Western and world civilizations increasingly avoid the use of the term 'feudalism'.

General

General

Non-European

References

Bibliography

Ganshof, François Louis (1996) [First published 1952]. Feudalism. London; New York: Longmans, Green. ISBN 978-0-8020-7158-3.

• Ganshof, François Louis (1996) [1st pub. 1952]. Feudalism. London; New York: Longmans, Green. ISBN 978-0-8020-7158-3.Historiographical works
  • Abels, Richard (2009). "The Historiography of a Construct: "Feudalism" and the Medieval Historian." History Compass. 7 (3): 1008–1031. doi:10.1111/j.1478-0542.2009.00610.x.Brown, Elizabeth (1974). "The Tyranny of a Construct: Feudalism and Historians of Medieval Europe." American Historical Review. 79 (4): 1063–1068. doi:10.2307/1869563. JSTOR 1869563.Cantor, Norman F. (1991). Inventing the Middle Ages: The Lives, Works, and Ideas of the Great Medievalists of the Twentieth Century. Quill.Friday, Karl (2010). "The Futile Paradigm: In Quest of Feudalism in Early Medieval Japan." History Compass. 8 (2): 179–196. doi:10.1111/j.1478-0542.2009.00664.x.Harbison, Robert (1996). The Problem of Feudalism: An Historiographical Essay. Western Kentucky University. Archived from the original on 29 February 2008.End of feudalism
    • Bean, J.M.W. (1968). Decline of English Feudalism, 1215–1540. OL 23803960M.Davitt, Michael (1904). The Fall of Feudalism in Ireland: Or, The Story of the Land League Revolution. OCLC 1595429. OL 23299170M.Hall, John Whitney (1962). "Feudalism in Japan—A Reassessment." Comparative Studies in Society and History. 5 (1): 15–51. doi:10.1017/S001041750000150X. JSTOR 177767. S2CID 145750386.Nell, Edward J. (1967). "Economic Relationships in the Decline of Feudalism: An Examination of Economic Interdependence and Social Change." History and Theory. 6 (3): 313–350. doi:10.2307/2504421. JSTOR 2504421.Okey, Robin (1986). Eastern Europe 1740–1985: Feudalism to Communism. University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 0816615616. OCLC 13644378. OL 2718094M.France
      • Herbert, Sydney. The Fall of Feudalism in France (1921).
      • Mackrell, John Quentin Colborne. The Attack on Feudalism in Eighteenth-Century France (Routledge, 2013).
      • Markoff, John. Abolition of Feudalism: Peasants, Lords, and Legislators in the French Revolution (Penn State Press, 2010).
      • Sutherland, D. M. G. (2002). "Peasants, Lords, and Leviathan: Winners and Losers from the Abolition of French Feudalism, 1780-1820." The Journal of Economic History. 62 (1): 1–24. JSTOR 2697970.
        • "Feudalism," authored by Elizabeth A. R. Brown, is available through Encyclopædia Britannica Online.
        • "Feudalism?" by Paul Halsall, is featured in the Internet Medieval Sourcebook.
        • "Feudalism: The History of an Idea," written by Fredric Cheyette (Amherst), is published in the New Dictionary of the History of Ideas (2004).
        • Medieval Feudalism, authored by Carl Stephenson, was published by Cornell University Press in 1942.
        • "The Problem of Feudalism: An Historiographical Essay," by Robert Harbison, was produced in 1996 by Western Kentucky University.